AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
I thought that Ryzen 3 looked like it was going to be a decent proposition yet I wasn't overly excited by what I saw. Sure, it beat Intel's Core i3 and locked i5 processors, but compared to SMT-enabled Ryzen 5 quad-cores, it seemed smarter to spend a little more on an eight-threaded part such as the R5 1400.
- As reviewed by TechSpot on Jul 2017
4
Cores
4
Threads
3.5 GHz
Base Clock
3.7 GHz
Boost Clock
Socket AM4
Socket
65 W
TDP
No iGPU
Graphics
| Release date: | Jul 27, 2017 | Price at Launch: | $129 |
| Cores: | 4 | Threads: | 4 |
| Base Clock: | 3.5 GHz | Boost Clock: | 3.7 GHz |
| Type: | Desktop | Multithreading: | No |
| L2 Cache: | 2 MB | L3 Cache: | 8 MB |
| Box Cooler: | Yes | TDP: | 65 W |
| Socket: | Socket AM4 | Memory Support: | DDR4-2666 |
| Codename: | Summit Ridge (Zen) | Process Size: | 14 nm |
| Integrated Graphics: | No | NPU: | No |
| PCIe Support: | PCIe 3.0, 24 Lanes |
Performance Benchmarks
All benchmark data reflects aggregated results from dozens of tests conducted in TechSpot’s labs and compiled from our full library of CPU reviews. Single-core productivity scores are based primarily on Cinebench and Adobe Photoshop workloads. Multi-core results draw from Cinebench, Blender, Corona Benchmark, 7-Zip, Adobe Premiere Pro, and shader compilation tests. CPU gaming benchmarks are all 1080p runs (explainer) as published on TechSpot.
I thought that Ryzen 3 looked like it was going to be a decent proposition yet I wasn't overly excited by what I saw. Sure, it beat Intel's Core i3 and locked i5 processors, but compared to SMT-enabled Ryzen 5 quad-cores, it seemed smarter to spend a little more on an eight-threaded part such as the R5 1400.
By TechSpot on