Intel Core i9-7980XE
Finally, I said that unless Intel is willing to move on pricing I couldn't see why anyone would invest in the X299 platform. That was my honest opinion and it's just as true with the arrival of these 16-core and 18-core parts from Intel. Unless I simply had the money to burn, I struggle to imagine a scenario where I would spend $1,000 (100%) more on the Core i9-7980XE to gain at best 20% more performance.
- As reviewed by TechSpot on Sep 2017
18
Cores
36
Threads
2.6 GHz
Base Clock
4.2 GHz
Boost Clock
Socket LGA 2066
Socket
165 W
TDP
No iGPU
Graphics
$3,235
Price
| Release date: | Sep 25, 2017 | Price at Launch: | $1,999 |
| Cores: | 18 | Threads: | 36 |
| Base Clock: | 2.6 GHz | Boost Clock: | 4.2 GHz |
| Type: | Desktop | Multithreading: | Yes |
| L2 Cache: | 18 MB | L3 Cache: | 24.75 MB |
| Box Cooler: | No | TDP: | 165 W |
| Socket: | Socket LGA 2066 | Memory Support: | DDR4-2666 |
| Codename: | Skylake | Process Size: | 14 nm |
| Integrated Graphics: | No | NPU: | No |
| PCIe Support: | PCIe 3.0, 44 lanes |
Performance Benchmarks
All benchmark data reflects aggregated results from dozens of tests conducted in TechSpot’s labs and compiled from our full library of CPU reviews. Single-core productivity scores are based primarily on Cinebench and Adobe Photoshop workloads. Multi-core results draw from Cinebench, Blender, Corona Benchmark, 7-Zip, Adobe Premiere Pro, and shader compilation tests. CPU gaming benchmarks are all 1080p runs (explainer) as published on TechSpot.
Finally, I said that unless Intel is willing to move on pricing I couldn't see why anyone would invest in the X299 platform. That was my honest opinion and it's just as true with the arrival of these 16-core and 18-core parts from Intel. Unless I simply had the money to burn, I struggle to imagine a scenario where I would spend $1,000 (100%) more on the Core i9-7980XE to gain at best 20% more performance.
By TechSpot on