Intel Core i9-7980XE

Finally, I said that unless Intel is willing to move on pricing I couldn't see why anyone would invest in the X299 platform. That was my honest opinion and it's just as true with the arrival of these 16-core and 18-core parts from Intel. Unless I simply had the money to burn, I struggle to imagine a scenario where I would spend $1,000 (100%) more on the Core i9-7980XE to gain at best 20% more performance.
- As reviewed by TechSpot on Sep 2017
18
Cores
36
Threads
2.6 GHz
Base Clock
4.2 GHz
Boost Clock
Socket LGA 2066
Socket
165 W
TDP
No iGPU
Graphics
$3,235
Price
Release date:Sep 25, 2017Price at Launch:$1,999
Cores:18Threads:36
Base Clock:2.6 GHzBoost Clock:4.2 GHz
Type:DesktopMultithreading:Yes
L2 Cache:18 MBL3 Cache:24.75 MB
Box Cooler:NoTDP:165 W
Socket:Socket LGA 2066Memory Support:DDR4-2666
Codename:SkylakeProcess Size:14 nm
Integrated Graphics:NoNPU:No
PCIe Support:PCIe 3.0, 44 lanes

Performance Benchmarks

All benchmark data reflects aggregated results from dozens of tests conducted in TechSpot’s labs and compiled from our full library of CPU reviews. Single-core productivity scores are based primarily on Cinebench and Adobe Photoshop workloads. Multi-core results draw from Cinebench, Blender, Corona Benchmark, 7-Zip, Adobe Premiere Pro, and shader compilation tests. CPU gaming benchmarks are all 1080p runs (explainer) as published on TechSpot.

Single-Core Productivity

Multi-Core Productivity

Gaming Performance

Reviews and Ratings

85

Average Score

Based on 18 reviews

7.2

User Score

Based on 30 reviews

Reviewers Liked

  • Fastest overall workstation performance available, especially for compression
  • Extremely easy to overclock
  • Decent wattage efficiency at stock
  • Good power consumption

Reviewers Didn't Like

  • Terrible value compared to AMD's Threadripper chips
  • Requires seriously powerful CPU coolers
  • Wattage spirals when OC'd
  • Extremely expensive
80

Finally, I said that unless Intel is willing to move on pricing I couldn't see why anyone would invest in the X299 platform. That was my honest opinion and it's just as true with the arrival of these 16-core and 18-core parts from Intel. Unless I simply had the money to burn, I struggle to imagine a scenario where I would spend $1,000 (100%) more on the Core i9-7980XE to gain at best 20% more performance.

By TechSpot on
80

A 4.5GHz overclock across 18 cores is a brilliant achievement for Intel as it reclaims the desktop performance crown, but only if you have an enormous bank account.8 Total ScoreIntel Core i9-7980XE ReviewAdd your review | Read reviews and...

By TopNewReview on
70

you end up with a lot more CPU cache in total.So how does it perform then? Well, that's easy to answer: this CPU is incredibly fast in threaded applications. There simply isn't a CPU that comes close to what the Core i9 7980XE can do in such an...

By nag.co.za on
90

On the face of it, this head-to-head would appear to be a relatively clear win for the Intel and NVIDIA-based Armari Magnetar S18X-RD850G2 over the all-AMD Armari Magnetar S16T-RW850G2. But look a little more closely and the result is nowhere near as...

By Kitguru.net on
80

So then, the big one. The price. $1,999 (about £1,480, AU$2,510) for a processor is nothing short of insane. Intel needed to come out swinging with this one, especially given just how cost-effective Threadripper is in contrast. You are also losing out...

By TechRadar on
90

Our advice is simple enough. Digital content creators and users coming from older workstations who genuinely need supreme single-socket performance and have the means to pay for it need to look no further. For everyone else, far better value can be had elsewhere in the Intel and AMD CPU stacks of 2017.

By Hexus on
90

Ultimately, the Core i9-7980XE will be useful to professionals whose cash might be well spent on a CPU of this calibre to cut processing times and save money, or for those that simply must have the best and are willing to pay the premium. The fact that you can get some or all cores to well over 4GHz as a minimum too means that it's also a much better all-rounder than its predecessors - particularly useful in lightly-threaded scenarios.

By Bit Tech on
90

Intel set out to recapture the performance lead for the high-end desktop consumer market and they were able to do that in some the multi-threaded benchmarks in our test suite. The Core i9-7980XE didn’t capture all the top spots though and that hurts when the Threadripper 1950X from AMD is $1000 less.

By LegitReviews on
90

If you demand the very best and will settle for nothing less, and have the budget necessary to surround the i9-7980XE with suitably high-end parts throughout your build, then clearly this is the processor for you. For the rest of us for whom a quad-core CPU is more befitting our financial status then only one recourse is possible; Dear Santa...

By Overclock3D on
90

While the cost, the power requirements and the thermals are significant factors for anyone to consider, the pros far outweigh the cons with the new CPU king. The performance is quite simply on a whole new level.

By eTeknix on
100

This processor is for someone who wants the best performance in multi-threaded workloads. Someone doing serious video and photo editing, workstation users, etc. Don’t get me wrong, this is a badass processor and anyone building an X299 system would love to have it, but its price puts it out of reach for most users.

By ThinkComputers on
95

Now that both AMD and Intel have shown their hand, we get to see which system will ultimately come out on top. From a cost concern, neither AMD's Threadripper platform or Intel's Basin Falls platform is going to hit your wallet pretty hard. But if you are a content creator or you just have to have the best money can buy, the choice is yours.

By OverclockersClub on

Our readers are also looking into these CPUs...