AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
In a nutshell, what makes the Ryzen 5 9600X a bad product is the fact that it's often slower than its predecessor and yet somehow costs 40% more. There's no reason anyone should buy this CPU unless its price drops considerably.
- As reviewed by TechSpot on Aug 2024
6
Cores
12
Threads
3.9 GHz
Base Clock
5.4 GHz
Boost Clock
Socket AM5
Socket
65 W
TDP
Radeon Graphics
Integrated Graphics
$191
Price
| Release date: | Aug 8, 2024 | Price at Launch: | $279 |
| Cores: | 6 | Threads: | 12 |
| Base Clock: | 3.9 GHz | Boost Clock: | 5.4 GHz |
| Type: | Desktop | Multithreading: | Yes |
| L2 Cache: | 6 MB | L3 Cache: | 32 MB |
| Box Cooler: | No | TDP: | 65 W |
| Socket: | Socket AM5 | Memory Support: | DDR5-5600 |
| Codename: | Granite Ridge (Zen 5) | Process Size: | 4 nm |
| Integrated Graphics: | Yes | iGPU Model: | Radeon Graphics |
| NPU: | No | PCIe Support: | PCIe 5.0, 28 Lanes |
Performance Benchmarks
All benchmark data reflects aggregated results from dozens of tests conducted in TechSpot’s labs and compiled from our full library of CPU reviews. Single-core productivity scores are based primarily on Cinebench and Adobe Photoshop workloads. Multi-core results draw from Cinebench, Blender, Corona Benchmark, 7-Zip, Adobe Premiere Pro, and shader compilation tests. CPU gaming benchmarks are all 1080p runs (explainer) as published on TechSpot.
Single-Core Productivity
Multi-Core Productivity
Gaming Performance
Price History
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X pricing
| Price | Date | |
| Current | $191 | Dec 15, 2025 |
| Highest* | $245 | Dec 15, 2024 |
| Lowest* | $156 | Jul 14, 2025 |
| Average | $192 | |
* Prices are based on listings from Newegg and other major retailers over the past 12+ months.
TechSpot is supported by its audience. We may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Learn more here.
TechSpot is supported by its audience. We may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Learn more here.
In a nutshell, what makes the Ryzen 5 9600X a bad product is the fact that it's often slower than its predecessor and yet somehow costs 40% more. There's no reason anyone should buy this CPU unless its price drops considerably.
By TechSpot on