Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus

The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is a highly efficient, blisteringly fast productivity CPU with gaming performance that rivals AMD at the same price point. When compared to the Ryzen 5 9600X, it's fair to say the 250K Plus is the better $200 offering. It's simply better at almost everything, and that's also what makes it a bit frustrating.
– As reviewed by TechSpot on Mar 2026
18
Cores
18
Threads
4.2 GHz
Base Clock
5.3 GHz
Boost Clock
Socket LGA 1851
Socket
125 W
TDP
Intel Arc Xe-LPG
Integrated Graphics
CPU Snapshot
Release date:Mar 26, 2026Price at Launch:$199
Type:DesktopSocket:Socket LGA 1851
Cores:18Threads:18
Performance Cores:6Efficient Cores:12
Multithreading:No
Clocks & Cache
Base Clock:4.2 GHzBoost Clock:5.3 GHz
Efficiency Core Clock:3.3 GHzEfficiency Core Boost Clock:4.6 GHz
L2 Cache:30 MBL3 Cache:30 MB
Platform
Codename:Arrow Lake RefreshProcess Size:3 nm
Memory Support:DDR5-7200TDP:125 W
PCIe Support:PCIe 5.0, 20 LanesBox Cooler:No
Integrated Features
Integrated Graphics:YesiGPU Model:Intel Arc Xe-LPG
NPU:YesTotal TOPS:33 TOPS

CPU Benchmarks

All benchmark data reflects aggregated results from dozens of tests conducted in TechSpot’s labs and compiled from our full library of CPU reviews. Single-core productivity scores are based primarily on Cinebench and Adobe Photoshop workloads. Multi-core results draw from Cinebench, Blender, Corona Benchmark, 7-Zip, Adobe Premiere Pro, and shader compilation tests. CPU gaming benchmarks are all 1080p runs (explainer) as published on TechSpot.

[CPU] Single-Core Productivity

[CPU] Multi-Core Productivity

[CPU] Gaming Performance

Reviews and Ratings

88

Average Score

Based on 9 reviews

Reviewers Liked

  • Improved value proposition
  • Improved gaming speeds over original "Arrow Lake" when used with a discrete graphics card
  • Potent integrated graphics
  • Great all-round chip

Reviewers Didn't Like

  • Requires pricey memory for top performance
  • Gaming performance still lags the competition
  • A little more power hungry than the 245K
  • 3D V-Cache will still pull the gaming-centric crowd with little effort
  • Dead-end platform
85

The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is a highly efficient, blisteringly fast productivity CPU with gaming performance that rivals AMD at the same price point. When compared to the Ryzen 5 9600X, it's fair to say the 250K Plus is the better $200 offering. It's simply better at almost everything, and that's also what makes it a bit frustrating.

By TechSpot on
80

The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus punches above its weight class and establishes a new baseline for what an entry-level processor should look like.

By Tom's Hardware on
80

For gaming-only systems, AMD still looks like the safer bet if absolute peak frame-rate leadership is the goal. But for users who want a broader desktop processor, one that can game well, create well, multitask well, and sit inside a modern feature-packed platform, Intel’s Core Ultra 200S Plus refresh is a definietly a step forward. It fixes enough, improves enough, and refines enough to make these processors far easier to recommend than the first wave.

By The Guru of 3D on
90

Intel's Core Ultra 5 250K Plus boosts gaming performance over its "Arrow Lake" predecessor at a price that's hard to pass up. It's not the fastest gaming CPU around, but no other chip goes as hard for so little money.

By PCMag on
89

Un salto que es muy evidente en el aumento de núcleos, prácticamente subiendo al escalón superior de la anterior generación, porque en este modelo de gama media llegamos a os 18 núcleos, lo que supone un aumento de rendimiento bruto que casi duplica al Ryzen directo el Ryzen 5 9600X.

By Profesional Review on
87

Don't be fooled by the $199 price tag. The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus might look like a budget processor, but it performs like an Ultra 7 class chip, and there's nothing to touch it for the money. That said, the Core Ultra 7 265K isn't that much more expensive, and it is the better chip for content creation tasks.

By PCGamer on
90

The Core Ultra 200S Plus chips will benefit PC gamers who can afford higher-speed RAM right now, while the optimistic Binary Optimization Tool should provide more granular, per-game boosts over future updates. Otherwise, these two CPUs are an incredible deal for content creators who moonlight as gamers. Both are phenomenal performance-per-dollar offerings that finally make LGA 1851 motherboards look more appealing, but dedicated gamers will likely remain "red".

By WindowsCentral on
100

The new Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Core Ultra 5 250K Plus do just that. They offer compelling choices at the $199 and $299 price points, respectively, so much so that AMD may no longer be the default go-to for people wanting to spend that amount of money on a desktop CPU.

By Neowin on
90

The Intel Core Ultra Plus processors are what the original LGA1851 models should have been. More energy efficient than the models they replace, more affordable thanks to the “waterfalling” of core counts. Intel Binary Optimisation Tool improves performance in many applications and is supremely easy to install and access thanks to the unified Intel Platform Performance Package.

By OC3D on

Intel's mid-model Arrow Lake refresh improves upon the original Core Ultra 200S processors in a number of meaningful ways to boost performance and value significantly.

By HotHardware on

In the end, it is therefore a pure refresh that shows the direction Intel wants to take, both architecturally and on the software side. The CPUs are powerful, in some cases very efficient, and clearly superior in certain scenarios. At the same time, the overall package is not free of limitations. The platform is at the end of its life cycle, the software is not fully mature yet, and the timing context is anything but ideal.

By igor's Lab on

Unfortunately, if you do opt for Intel's Arrow Lake refresh, know that socket 1851 is a dead-end platform that's soon to be replaced by Intel's Nova Lake family of processors. Timing on those parts is still a bit fuzzy, but we expect to see them either late this year or at CES in January.

By The Register on

Our readers are also looking into these CPUs...